Josh: 1 revision imported

2025-09-06T22:22:46Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 6 September 2025
(No difference)

RetroTechCollection>Ira Leviton: Fixed a duplicate parameter. Please see Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls.

2025-08-25T01:02:19Z

Fixed a duplicate parameter. Please see Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls.

New page

{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>db-notice
|namespace = {{{namespace|}}}
|target = {{{1}}}
|nowelcome = {{{nowelcome|}}}
|header = {{{header|}}}
|header-text = {{{header-text|}}}
|wizard = yes
|willprovide = no
|button = yes
|text = A tag has been placed on [[:{{{1}}}]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#G15|section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by [[large language model]]s (an "[[AI chatbot]]" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any ''reasonable human review'':
* '''Communication intended for the user''': This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
* '''Implausible non-existent references''': This may include external links that are [[Wikipedia:Link rot|dead]] on arrival, [[ISBN]]s with invalid [[checksum]]s, and unresolvable [[Digital Object Identifiers|DOI]]s. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from [[link rot]], a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
* '''Nonsensical citations''': This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
| if you think that = these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content
|additionally =– if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]], and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions.}} <noinclude>

{{documentation}}

</noinclude>

Template:Db-llm-notice - Revision history

Josh: 1 revision imported

RetroTechCollection>Ira Leviton: Fixed a duplicate parameter. Please see Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls.