Editing Template talk:Protection padlock (section)

== New reason proposal ==

Hello, I have a new suggestion for a reason proposal. I have been loooking for a bit, and I figured that a disruptive editing reason should be added (because the two main causes of semi-protection is either vandalism or disruptive editing. It would be great for this to be added, as there are a high amount of articles being protected from disruptive editing (I'm not too sure if vandalism and disruptive editing mean the same thing, or if they both have the same point). If you could consider the option for disruptive editing as a reason for this heavy used template, that would be great. Thank you, and have a good day. --[[User:Redolta|<span style="color:red;">'''Red'''</span><span style="color:black;">'''olta'''</span>]] [[User talk:Redolta|(talk)]] 01:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
:{{replyto|Redolta}} See [[WP:DE]] and [[WP:VAND]]. Vandalism is a special case of disruptive editing: the difference is basically one of intent. But this is the wrong page to discuss extension of reasons for protection: the {{tlx|pp}} template merely reflects the current protection of a page which was protected in accordance with [[WP:PROT]], so, a far better place to discuss changing the policy would be [[WT:PROT]] or even [[WP:VPP]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 10:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
::Ok, thank you for the explanation. I now understand. [[User:Redolta|<span style="color:red;">'''Red'''</span><span style="color:black;">'''olta'''</span>]] [[User talk:Redolta|(talk)]] 13:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)