Jump to content

Retrobrite: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

23 September 2026

  • curprev 02:2702:27, 23 September 2026 Josh talk contribs 13,374 bytes −29 Fix the 6 per cent row of the hazard table: at 6 per cent the classification is Eye Irrit. 2 (H319), not Eye Dam. 1, which applies from 8 per cent undo
  • curprev 02:1502:15, 23 September 2026 Josh talk contribs 13,403 bytes −103 Remove self-referential wording per house rule undo
  • curprev 02:0902:09, 23 September 2026 Josh talk contribs 13,506 bytes +5,577 Rewrite with citations: deleted the unsourced 9-row treatment-duration/effectiveness table (no published study of durations exists); corrected the mechanism claim (published literature attributes ABS photodiscolouration to photo-oxidation of the polymer, not solely to brominated flame retardants); added GB/EU CLP hazard classification by concentration (H318 serious eye damage from 8 percent, so 12 percent salon developer is not merely an irritant) and the 12 percent cosmetics ceiling; added t... undo

14 August 2025

4 April 2025

12 March 2025